Trump Should Have Pardoned Snowden & Assange

Who is Trump Should Have Pardoned Snowden & Assange?

This clip is taken from the Joe Rogan Experience 1601 with Brian Redban. https://open.spotify.com/episode/6JIy9Ml1zHUwXuCi4KJsos?si=YrcRr9QARluMYOSlJJ9YAA

Topics and Timestamps

• 01Joe and Brian discuss why Trump should have pardoned Edward Snowden before leaving office
• 02The conversation explores Snowden's whistleblowing on NSA mass surveillance programs and its importance
• 03Discussion of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks' role in exposing government secrets
• 04Arguments about government transparency versus national security concerns
• 05Analysis of the implications of not pardoning whistleblowers and what it means for future transparency
• 06Joe and Brian consider the political and moral reasons behind Trump's decision not to pardon them
• ▶Joe and Brian introduce the topic of Trump not pardoning Snowden and Assange0:00:00
• ▶Discussion of Snowden's NSA surveillance revelations and their impact0:10:30
• ▶Analysis of why Snowden's actions should be considered a public service0:25:45
• ▶Conversation shifts to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks role in government transparency0:40:00
• ▶Joe and Brian debate the moral and political case for presidential pardons0:55:15

The Show

In this episode of JRE 1601, Joe Rogan and Brian Redban dive into the controversial topic of presidential pardons, specifically focusing on why Trump should have pardoned Edward Snowden and Julian Assange before leaving office. The conversation centers on the tension between government transparency and national security, two values that often seem at odds in American politics.

Joe and Brian explore Snowden's massive leak of NSA surveillance programs, which revealed to the American public the extent to which their communications were being monitored. They discuss how Snowden exposed unconstitutional mass surveillance that affected millions of American citizens, making a case that his actions were fundamentally about informing the public of illegal government overreach. The guys acknowledge that regardless of one's political position, Snowden provided a massive public service by revealing programs that courts and lawmakers later agreed were problematic.

The conversation moves into Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, discussing how both men became international figures for their roles in exposing classified information. Joe and Brian examine the differences in how these whistleblowers are perceived, with some viewing them as heroes for transparency and others seeing them as threats to national security. They consider the moral and political arguments for why a president might want to use their pardon power to protect these individuals from persecution.

Throughout the episode, Joe and Brian grapple with the philosophical question of whether governments should be allowed to keep secrets from their citizens, especially when those secrets involve domestic surveillance programs. They discuss how pardoning Snowden and Assange could have been seen as a statement about valuing transparency and limiting government overreach, making it a missed opportunity for Trump to align his actions with anti-establishment rhetoric.

The guys also touch on the practical consequences of not pardoning these men, including their legal jeopardy and the precedent it sets for future whistleblowers. They explore whether the lack of pardons reflects Trump's actual priorities or a miscalculation about what actions would have been most impactful as his presidency concluded.

Best Quotes